Meet
the Death
Metal Cowboys of Botswana. In
black leather decorated with metal studs, they play a pounding style of music
that people who know more than me trace to the British band “Venom” and its
1981 album Welcome to Hell.
Question: Is this Cultural Appropriation? Why or why not?
Cultural Appropriation has more than ever become a
topic of debate, some arguing its unacceptable while others counter arguing
that it promotes cultural exchange. Before we deep dive into this topic, I feel
it’s appropriate that we first define the word. According to Oxford dictionary,
Cultural Appropriation is the ‘Unacknowledged or inappropriate adoption of the
practices, customs, or aesthetics of one social or ethnic group by members of
another (typically dominant) community or society.
At Oberlin in 2015, a Vietnamese student shamed the
dining hall into ceasing to serve its version of Banh Mi sandwiches.
Instead of a crispy baguette with grilled pork, pate, pickled vegetables and
fresh herbs, the sandwich used ciabatta bread, pulled pork and coleslaw. “It
was ridiculous …. How could they just throw out something completely different
and label it as another country’s traditional food?”
The references to “baguette” and “pâté” in a food
product of a former French colony might have tipped off the angry Oberlin student
that the banh mi is not quite as traditional a Vietnamese food as she imagined.
When this exotic remake of a classic pate en baguette was
first sold in the streets of Hanoi, the vendors called it “banh tay”: literally
"Western-style bread.”
In as much as some can argue that it is human nature
to interact with other communities or people of different identities and borrow
some cultural aspects, we need to learn that sometimes there is a thin line
between appreciation and appropriation. This is particularly vital when the
borrowing does lead to exploitation. Let’s
discuss ways in which cultural appropriation is negatively impacting
preservation of cultural heritage.
1.
Exploitation
What has been termed as borrowing for a very long time
has been brought to light and it has been identified as exploitation. A good
example that is very recent is fashion industries taking cultural pieces and
making huge profits out of it without incorporating the communities to which
the culture belongs to taking into consideration most of these communities
still grapple in poverty. Trademarking is never a solution and absence of
trademarks doesn’t mean exploitation is appropriate.
2.
Silencing, Erasure
and Misrepresentation
One of the harms of cultural appropriation is
misrepresentation which can make a culture come across as untrue or misleading.
This can often times breed prejudice and stereotypes. Making a culture seems
like a representation of the whole community can often times cause the culture
in question to lose its specific meaning.
A Canadian university cancelled its yoga classes as
Culturally Appropriating – notwithstanding that most of the strenuous moves
taught in a modern class actually originate in Danish gymnastics and British
army calisthenics, which were in turn appropriated by Indian entrepreneurs
seeking to update yoga from a meditative to an active practice for the body-conscious
modern age.
Cultural Appropriation has often times denied some
members of a group to represent or speak for themselves especially marginalized
groups and communities. In some instances, it causes erasure, this comes about
when it popularizes an action or a piece from a culture but fails to educate on
its significance.
3.
Offense
The damage cultural appropriation causes is not just
to a single individual but to a large group and can cause an offense to one’s
moral sensibilities.
The fashion industry is one of the major culprits of Cultural
Appropriation; we’ve seen instances where models wear bindis, turban and other
significant cultural and religious garments as a fashion piece. During the
Milan Fashion Week 2018, Gucci appropriated Sikh turbans and Hijab and having non-Sikhs
models wearing turbans, which carry great significance for the Sikhs as it’s
not a fashion trend rather demonstrates their faith. There was a public outcry calling
out Gucci especially considering how Muslims and Sikhs are mocked for the
turbans and hijabs and often targeted with violence for wearing them in public.
So, does this mean it’s always wrong to engage with a
different culture?
Nope! There are times when it’s encouraged to try
something from a different culture. Being invited to an Indian wedding where
the hosts are cool with you wearing traditional clothing is not cultural
appropriation. You’re invited to take part by people from that culture. So, the
all-important ideas of dominance and oppression don’t exist here, which is what
makes cultural appropriation a big deal in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment